That just doesn’t make sense any more: as a matter of fact today application servers are also extremely fast and light. For example, the most common myth is that Java EE application servers are heavyweight and Spring is a lighter platform. The comparison between Spring/Spring Boot and Java EE application servers like WildFly is often based on assumptions that just don’t fit it in any more. The natural choice if you don’t embrace the Java EE standard is to use Spring, or the configuration-less version of it Spring Boot. So we have to add something on the top of Tomcat to be more productive, resilient, reliable etc. Even if you just need the Web stack, a framework is needed on the top of it to organize most common aspects like Models, Controllers and Views. Why ? in today’s projects, almost none (except very small projects) rely just on JSP or Servlets. WildFly vs Tomcat: a modern viewĬleared the basics, today when we compare WildFly with Tomcat we often mean to compare Java EE with Spring. then you need an application server like WildFly. If you are using additional Java EE components like EJB, CDI, Transaction Manager etc.
So in a nutshell, if you are designing a Java EE application that uses Servlets/JSP stuff you can run it both on WildFly and Tomcat.
#Tomcat vs glassfish performance full
The difference between WildFly and Tomcat is pretty straightforward: WildFly is a full Java EE application Server, while Tomcat is a Java servlet container and web server and, since because it doesn’t come with an implementation of the full JEE stack, it is lighter out of the box. (Check this to learn more: What is JBoss ?) I assume you are referring to “WildFly” application server that is the new name for the Community version of the application server developed by Red Hat Team. There is not anymore a single product called “JBoss”, but just a unit of Red Hat with that name which develops middleware products. First of all the wording “JBoss” is improper.
0 kommentar(er)
